Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123820›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Comparative transcriptome analysis provides novel insights into molecular response of salt-tolerant and sensitive polyembryonic mango genotypes to salinity stress at seedling stage.

Nusrat Perveen, M R Dinesh, M Sankaran, K V Ravishankar, Hara Gopal Krishnajee, Vageeshbabu S Hanur, Saud Alamri, Mahipal Singh Kesawat, Mohammad Irfan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Caffeic AcidInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nusrat PerveenDivision of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lakepost, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M R DineshDivision of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lakepost, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M SankaranDivision of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lakepost, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
K V RavishankarDivision of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lakepost, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Hara Gopal KrishnajeeDivision of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lakepost, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vageeshbabu S HanurDivision of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lakepost, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Saud AlamriDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahipal Singh KesawatSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mohammad IrfanSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research · INSeoul National University · KRKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Increased soil salinity in the recent years has adversely affected the productivity of mango globally. Extending the cultivation of mango in salt affected regions warrants the use of salinity tolerant/resistant rootstocks. However, the lack of sufficient genomic and transcriptomic information impedes comprehensive research at the molecular level. Method: We employed RNA sequencing-based transcriptome analysis to gain insight into molecular response to salt stress by using two polyembryonic mango genotypes with contrasting response to salt stress viz., salt tolerant Turpentine and salt susceptible Mylepelian. Results: RNA sequencing by Novaseq6000 resulted in a total of 2795088, 17535948, 7813704 and 5544894 clean reads in Mylepelian treated (MT), Mylepelian control (MC), Turpentine treated (TT) and Turpentine control (TC) respectively. In total, 7169 unigenes annotated against all the five public databases, including NR, NT, PFAM, KOG, Swissport, KEGG and GO. Further, maximum number of differentially expressed genes were found between MT and MC (2106) followed by MT vs TT (1158) and TT and TC (587). The differentially expressed genes under different treatment levels included transcription factors (bZIP, NAC, bHLH), genes involved in Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), ABA biosynthesis, Photosynthesis etc. Expression of few of these genes was experimentally validated through quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and contrasting expression pattern of Auxin Response Factor 2 (ARF2), Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) and CDPK genes were observed between Turpentine and Mylepelian. Discussion: The results of this study will be useful in understanding the molecular mechanism underlying salt tolerance in mango which can serve as valuable baseline information to generate new targets in mango breeding for salt tolerance.

Indexed as

mangoMylepelianpolyembryonyRNA-Seqsalinity stressSOS pathwaytranscriptomeTurpentine

Identifiers

PMID37123820
PMCPMC10141464
OpenAlexW4365150355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.