Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123808›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Contemporary Review of Masses in the Canal of Nuck.

Hard Tilva, Surekha Tayade, Ankita Kanjiya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hard TilvaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Surekha TayadeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Ankita KanjiyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sharda Hospital & Research Centre, Surat, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canal of Nuck masses is a rare occurrence that can cause swelling in the abdominal-inguinal region of females for various reasons. This condition arises due to an abnormal persistence of the processus vaginalis opening. Although Canal of Nuck pathology is not widely known among general surgeons or gynecologists due to its rarity, it has been associated with significant morbidity and requires further research. In this comprehensive review, we aim to summarize the embryology and anatomy of the Canal of Nuck, followed by a description of the various types of masses that can occur in this region. We discuss the clinical presentation and diagnostic workup of Canal of Nuck masses, including imaging modalities and differential diagnoses. Next, we review the surgical management of these masses, including open and laparoscopic approaches. Finally, we discuss the potential complications and long-term outcomes associated with Canal of Nuck pathology. This review aims to compile the presently accessible literature on anomalies occurring in the Canal of Nuck in females, with a particular focus on describing their pathological nature, diagnosis, and management. In summary, this review provides an up-to-date understanding of the pathology, diagnosis, and management of Canal of Nuck masses and aims to raise awareness of this under-recognized surgical challenge among healthcare providers.

Indexed as

cysts.endometriosisfemalefemale hydroceleherniahydroceleinguinal herniamassesthe canal of nucktumors

Identifiers

PMID37123808
PMCPMC10130799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.