Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123793›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Osteopathic Manipulation as a Method of Cortisol Modification: A Systematic Review.

Dylan Thibaut, Valentine Santarlas, Joseph Hoppes, Alejandra Vásquez-Castillo, Alexa Morrow, Eddie Oviedo, James Toldi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07631949 (Effects of Osteopathy on Pain, Function, Quality of Life, Stress Hormones and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Women With Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07631949 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Osteopathy on Pain, Function, Quality of Life, Stress Hormones and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Women With Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHalic UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsPostpartum Lumbopelvic Pain, Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain, Postpartum Low Back PainArmsCore Stabilization Exercises, Patient Education, Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment, Sham Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dylan ThibautOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Valentine SantarlasOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Joseph HoppesOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Alejandra Vásquez-CastilloOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Alexa MorrowOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Eddie OviedoOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
James ToldiSports Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in the modification of various hormones has been studied; however, there is still a need for quantitative measurements to determine how large of an influence exists. The goal of this meta-analysis is to investigate the implications OMT has on cortisol levels. A systematic literature search restricted to English was performed from October 2022 to November 2022 using Google Scholar, OSTMED.DR, and PubMed and included articles from 2000 onward. Articles were excluded if they did not include a measurement for the control group in their study. We identified 4120 studies for potential inclusion. Of these, a total of four studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 135 participants (N= 68 OMT, N= 67 control). Out of the 135 participants, 126 participants (N= 62 OMT, N= 64 control) made up the salivary cortisol studies, and the remaining nine participants made up the serum cortisol studies (OMT N= 6, control N= 3). The National Institutes of Health (NIH) bias assessment tool was utilized to measure the risk of bias. Standard mean differences were calculated for effect size. A mean difference in cortisol of 0.10μg/dl (-10μg/dl, 95%CI -0.15, -0.04) was found when comparing all pre- versus post-cortisol levels with OMT versus sham control groups. OMT demonstrated a 0.10μg/dl larger decrease in cortisol than sham control treatments. The standard mean difference was found to be -0.46 (95%CI -1.40, 0.48) making this finding a medium effect size without significance. Heterogeneity for the salivary analysis measured by I

Indexed as

cortisoldoctor of osteopathic medicineommomtosteopathic manipulationosteopathic manipulative medicineosteopathic manipulative treatmentsalivary cortisol studiesserum cortisol studiessham

Identifiers

PMID37123793
PMCPMC10143077
OpenAlexW4361284731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.