Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123764›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Prevalence of Myopia Among Primary School Male Students in Bisha, Saudi Arabia.

Ibrahim Eljack, Yazeed Alshahrani

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ibrahim EljackCommunity Medicine, College of Medicine, Bisha University, Bisha, SAU.
Yazeed AlshahraniCommunity Medicine, College of Medicine, Bisha University, Bisha, SAU.
University of Bisha · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Myopia (shortsightedness) is considered a major health problem globally which has increased in the last few decades. This study aims to determine the prevalence of myopia and the associated risk factors among primary school students in Bisha, Saudi Arabia. Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study included 330 male students from five boys' schools in Bisha city. Students underwent an interview questionnaire that composed of (sociodemographic data, risk factors, and ocular history). Students' vision was assessed by an optometrist through the use of a Snellen chart and the result was converted to a Diopter unit (D). Myopia was defined as the spherical equivalent (SE) of ≤ - 0.5 D. Binomial statistical test was used to get a prevalence of myopia with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Chi-square analytical test was used to compare myopic and non-myopic groups on multiple variables. Results were considered statistically significant at p-value ≤ 0.05. Results The mean age of 330 male students was 11.29 ± 0.97. The prevalence of myopia was (32.7%, 95% CI: 27.7-38.1%), and the mean of the SE of participants was - 0.25 ± 0.60 D. Myopia prevalence was increased with age and school grade of participants (p ≤ 0.05). Students who spent a long time (more than three hours) on near activity are at risk of developing myopia (p ≤ 0.001). having one or both parents affected by myopia was not statistically significant with the prevalence of myopia (p = 0.175). Children who spent a long time outdoors tend to have a lower risk of myopia (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion The study showed a high prevalence of myopia among schoolchildren in Bisha city. Therefore, it is recommended to plan for future screening programs for myopia.

Indexed as

myopiaprevalencerisk factorsspherical equivalentstudent

Identifiers

PMID37123764
PMCPMC10134407
OpenAlexW4361204283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.