Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123755›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Exploring the Role of Wearable Electronic Medical Devices in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Outcomes Among Adults: A Systematic Review.

Kofi Seffah, Mustafa Abrar Zaman, Nimra Awais, Travis Satnarine, Ayesha Haq, Grethel N Hernandez, Safeera Khan

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kofi SeffahInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mustafa Abrar ZamanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Nimra AwaisResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Travis SatnarinePediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ayesha HaqInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Grethel N HernandezInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Safeera KhanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a developing trend of using wearable electronic devices as health aides, spurred on by telecommunication companies as fitness devices and marketed as such. They have been shown to count steps, pulse, and record arrhythmias, doubling as communication devices and prompting healthcare providers in some instances. We sought to determine if there was a direct correlation between device use and increased physical activity as recommended by the World Health Organization, or if this physical activity increase was only marginal at best. In addition, we sought to investigate if there were additional benefits to using these devices besides increased self-awareness of health. This systematic review used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Keywords for searching articles centered around cardiovascular disease, wearable electronic devices, and their synonyms. Most of the data were obtained from PubMed, although other contributing databases were used, including ResearchGate, Science.gov, ScienceDirect, and PubMed Medical Subject Headings database. Only full-text articles were used. We identified 62 articles that met our search criteria but narrowed them down to 19 following qualitative assessment. Increased physical activity was found to be the one parameter that stood out by way of benefit from the device. Other findings, such as reduced waist circumference, obesity, glycated hemoglobin, and lipid levels, shared mixed results. At this time, we do not have a definition of what duration of device use is deemed standard for health. We have no consensus on which devices are superior health-wise. Our study, however, indicates that these devices, used with adequate health professional supervision, have a role to play in motivation and increased physical activity, enough to cause impactful gains in cardiovascular health.

Indexed as

awarenessheart diseasemodifiable risk factorsmotivationphysical activitypredictive toolspreventionwearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID37123755
PMCPMC10132699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.