Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123751›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Efficacy of Intranasal Atomized Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Prospective Study.

Marupaka Bhargavi, Gangisetty Sai Sarath, Pratik Surana, Kanika S Dhull, Maheen Shaikh, Milind Rajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marupaka BhargaviDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, IND.
Gangisetty Sai SarathDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, IND.
Pratik SuranaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, IND.
Kanika S DhullDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Maheen ShaikhDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M A Rangoonwala college of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Milind RajanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine atomized intranasally for sedation during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective randomized trial was conducted on 25 anxious patients between the ages of 18 and 40 who had impacted the lower third molars. An intranasal atomization device was used to give the medication 30 minutes prior to the surgical procedure. The Ramsay sedation score and Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation score were used to assess intranasal sedation.

resultsThe results of our study state that the sedative effect began to take effect between 30 and 45 minutes later and was nearly back to baseline by 105 minutes after the administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine.

conclusionIntranasal delivery of 1.5mg/kg atomized dexmedetomidine for patients undergoing surgical removal of impacted mandibular third teeth is safe, feasible, and clinically efficient in daycare settings based on the sedation scores, and secondary variables which were assessed.

Indexed as

atomized dexmedetomidineimpacted mandibular third molarsintranasalsedationsurgical removal

Identifiers

PMID37123751
PMCPMC10139674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.