Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Abdominal type B vs. type C radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A matched single center cohort report.

Lu Wang, Ping Liu, Hui Duan, Pengfei Li, Guidong Su, Weili Li, Cong Liang, Chunlin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui DuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pengfei LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guidong SuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weili LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cong LiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunlin ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Nanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare survival outcomes of type B radical hysterectomy (RH) and type C RH in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively identified continuous cervical cancer patients with FIGO stage IA2-IB2 and IIA1 who underwent either type B RH ( Results: The median follow-up period was 42.41 ± 24.60 months. After adjusting, no differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were found between the type B group and the type C group (OS: 87.8% vs. 89.4%, Conclusions: Type B RH could be used to treat FIGO stage IA2-IB2 and IIA1 cervical cancer to get equivalent 5-year OS and DFS. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Indexed as

cervical cancerearly-stageparametrectomysurvival outcometype b radical hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID37123543
PMCPMC10130524
OpenAlexW4365148530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.