Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123514›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of biomedical data science2018

Data Science Issues in Studying Protein-RNA Interactions with CLIP Technologies.

Anob M Chakrabarti, Nejc Haberman, Arne Praznik, Nicholas M Luscombe, Jernej Ule

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of biomedical data science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Understanding species-specific and conserved RNA-protein interactionsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anob M Chakrabarti *The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Nejc Haberman *The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Arne PraznikThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Nicholas M LuscombeThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Jernej UleThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research Council 617837Wellcome Trust 103760Wellcome Trust 103761Wellcome Trust 110292Wellcome Trust FC001002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An interplay of experimental and computational methods is required to achieve a comprehensive understanding of protein-RNA interactions. UV crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) identifies endogenous interactions by sequencing RNA fragments that copurify with a selected RNA-binding protein under stringent conditions. Here we focus on approaches for the analysis of the resulting data and appraise the methods for peak calling, visualization, analysis, and computational modeling of protein-RNA binding sites. We advocate that the sensitivity and specificity of data be assessed in combination for computational quality control. Moreover, we demonstrate the value of analyzing sequence motif enrichment in peaks assigned from CLIP data and of visualizing RNA maps, which examine the positional distribution of peaks around regulated landmarks in transcripts. We use these to assess how variations in CLIP data quality and in different peak calling methods affect the insights into regulatory mechanisms. We conclude by discussing future opportunities for the computational analysis of protein-RNA interaction experiments.

Indexed as

CLIPdata qualitypeak callingribonucleoprotein complexesRNA-binding proteinRNA map

Identifiers

PMID37123514
PMCPMC7614488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.