Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123384›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2023

Birth attendants' attitudes and practice of companionship during facility-based childbirth and associated factors in the West Shoa Zone, central Ethiopia: A mixed method design.

Yonas Sagni Doba, Gizachew Abdissa Bulto, Eden Girmaye Tefera, Negash Wakgari, Temesgen Daksisa, Tura Muda, Gurmessa Daba Dina, Berhanu Ejara Moti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yonas Sagni DobaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-9289
Gizachew Abdissa BultoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-1418
Eden Girmaye TeferaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Negash WakgariDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Temesgen DaksisaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mada Walabu University, Shashemane, Ethiopia.
Tura MudaElwaye District Health Office, Borena Zone, Yabello, Ethiopia.
Gurmessa Daba DinaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Berhanu Ejara MotiDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The World Health Organization strongly recommends companion of choice for all women during health facility delivery. However, in the developing countries, it is low and not well studied in Ethiopia. Thus, the study aimed to assess the birth attendants' attitude and practice of companionship during health facility-based childbirth and associated factors in the West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study design with a concurrent mixed method approach was employed from 17 August to 23 September 2021. A simple random sampling was used to collect data from 422 birth attendants using a pretested structured self-administered questionnaire. The data was entered into Epi-data 3.1 and exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were done. The qualitative data was analyzed manually using thematic analysis, and the result was triangulated with the quantitative data. Results: About, 208 (51.2%) of birth attendants had favorable attitude, and only 79 (19.5%) of them reported that they practice companion presence during childbirth. Reported job satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio = 5.29, 95% confidence interval: 3.08, 9.1), presence of a screen (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.94, 5.99), and wideness of the delivery room (adjusted odds ratio = 4.74, 95% confidence interval: 2.48, 9.04) were factors associated with the attitude of birth attendants. The number of deliveries per month (adjusted odds ratio = 3.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.37, 8.13), having had training (adjusted odds ratio = 3.286, 95% confidence interval: 1.52, 7.08), and presence of a screen (adjusted odds ratio = 2.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.42, 5.85) were statistically associated with practice of companion presence during childbirth. The main themes that emerged as the key barriers to the practice of companion presence during childbirth include structural factors, societal norms and culture, lack of interest, birth attendant-related barriers, unsupportive administration protocol, and companions' awareness. Conclusion: The magnitude of favorable attitudes and reported practice of birth attendants regarding companion presence during childbirth is low. Structural related factors were the main barriers. Training of birth attendants and structural interventions are needed to ensure that delivery rooms are designed in ways that facilitate the presence of companions during childbirth.

Indexed as

Attitudebirth attendantscompanionshippracticeWest Shoa Zone

Identifiers

PMID37123384
PMCPMC10134150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.