SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2023
The associations of decent work with wellbeing and career capabilities: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The decent work level of nurses in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- FromAnnals of global health · 2026Review
- The impact of perceived organizational support on nurses' safety behavior: the sequential mediating roles of decent work perception and job embeddedness.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of Moral Courage Including the Role of Workplace Conditions, Grief Support, and Salary Among Surgical Nurses in Jiaxing Tertiary Class A Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- More than a game: the impact of decent work on work engagement among athletes through the serial mediation of visions about future and sport anxiety.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Decent and Precarious Work Among Nursing and Care Workers: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As a global sustainable development goal, the decent work notion has been promoted all over the world at theoretical, practical, and research levels for the purpose of enhancing people's capacity to enjoy freedom, equity, security, and human dignity at work. However, conclusive findings of the impact of decent work on people's wellbeing and longer-term career development are still missing due to a lack of systematic reviews on this topic. This study aims to (a) investigate the associations of decent work with people's wellbeing and their capabilities for sustaining career development and (b) examine the differential associations across different subgroups. Methods: Databases of literature archived on or before 4 March 2022 were searched. A total of 46 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis for the combined Pearson correlation coefficient (r) to estimate the associations of decent work with wellbeing and career capabilities, among which 30 studies (16,026 participants) were used for calculating the association between decent work and wellbeing whereas 26 studies (12,384 participants) were used for decent work and career capabilities. Results and discussion: First, decent work demonstrates a medium association with wellbeing (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.