ArticleiScience2023
A five-safes approach to a secure and scalable genomics data repository.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genome-wide association study reveals a novel tuberculosis susceptibility locus in multiple East Asian and European populations.Genome medicine · 2026Pooled it
- AI-based multimodal integration of genomics and electronic health records.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Translating genomic data into healthcare practice with the Singapore National Precision Medicine program.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Integrative Genomic Analyses IdentifybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- A reanalysis of a genome-wide association study on breast cancer in Asian populations using the SG10K_Health reference panel for imputation: a multi-Centre case-control analysis.Human molecular genetics · 2026Article
- Predictive capabilities of polygenic scores in an East-Asian population-based cohort: the Singapore Chinese health study.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The Causal Effect of Adult Height on Late-Life Handgrip Strength: The Singapore Chinese Health Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic researchers increasingly utilize commercial cloud service providers (CSPs) to manage data and analytics needs. CSPs allow researchers to grow Information Technology (IT) infrastructure on demand to overcome bottlenecks when combining large datasets. However, without adequate security controls, the risk of unauthorized access may be higher for data stored on the cloud. Additionally, regulators are mandating data access patterns and specific security protocols for the storage and use of genomic data. While CSP provides tools for security and regulatory compliance, building the necessary controls required for cloud solutions is not trivial. Research Assets Provisioning and Tracking Online Repository (RAPTOR) by the Genome Institute of Singapore is a cloud-native genomics data repository and analytics platform that implements a "five-safes" framework to provide security and governance controls to data contributors and users, leveraging CSP for sharing and analysis of genomic datasets without the risk of security breaches or running afoul of regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.