Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123225›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Human understandable thyroid ultrasound imaging AI report system - A bridge between AI and clinicians.

Siqiong Yao, Pengcheng Shen, Tongwei Dai, Fang Dai, Yun Wang, Weituo Zhang, Hui Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siqiong YaoJoint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Pengcheng ShenJoint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Tongwei DaiJoint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Fang DaiJoint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary pancreatic center, Xuzhou City Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of the Southeast University Medical School (Xu zhou), The Tumor Research Institute of the Southeast University (Xu zhou), Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Weituo ZhangHong Qiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hui LuJoint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) enables accurate diagnosis of thyroid cancer; however, the lack of explanation limits its application. In this study, we collected 10,021 ultrasound images from 8,079 patients across four independent institutions to develop and validate a human understandable AI report system named TiNet for thyroid cancer prediction. TiNet can extract thyroid nodule features such as texture, margin, echogenicity, shape, and location using a deep learning method conforming to the clinical diagnosis standard. Moreover, it offers excellent prediction performance (AUC 0.88) and provides quantitative explanations for the predictions. We conducted a reverse cognitive test in which clinicians matched the correct ultrasound images according to TiNet and clinical reports. The results indicated that TiNet reports (87.1% accuracy) were significantly easier to understand than clinical reports (81.6% accuracy; p < 0.001). TiNet can serve as a bridge between AI-based diagnosis and clinicians, enhancing human-AI cooperative medical decision-making.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiotechnologyRadiation biologyUltrasound technology

Identifiers

PMID37123225
PMCPMC10130923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.