ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023
Comparison of time to recurrent biliary obstruction between plastic stents and metallic stents for endoscopic ultrasound‑guided biliary drainage.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metallic versus plastic stents for the management of biliary obstruction: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Risk Factors Associated with Recurrent Biliary Obstruction After Endoscopic Bilioduodenal Double Stenting.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of plastic and metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound guided-biliary drainage in elderly patients.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Metal stent versus plastic stent in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: Large single-center retrospective comparative study.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) may prevent stent placement at the bile duct stricture. Therefore, whether a plastic stent (PS) or metallic stent (MS) should be used for EUS-BD remains to be undetermined. The present study aimed to clarify whether a PS or MS was more efficient for EUS-BD. Patients with malignant biliary obstruction who were successfully treated with EUS-BD were enrolled in the present study. The clinical characteristics, procedural outcomes and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) were compared between patients treated with a PS (PS group) and patients treated with an MS (MS group). Consequently, 28 patients underwent PS placement and 11 patients underwent MS placement. In the PS group, 12 patients also underwent EUS-antegrade stenting (AGS) using an MS. The TRBO was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.25). When the patients with AGS were excluded, the TRBO was significantly longer in the MS group than in the PS group (P=0.036). However, the TRBO was not significantly different between the patients in the MS group and those in the PS group who underwent AGS (P=0.61). In EUS-BD, MS is expected to be associated with a longer TRBO than PS. However, combining EUS-BD with AGS may help overcome the shorter TRBO associated with the use of PS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.