Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123201›Full record

ArticleJournal of CME2023

Report on the Peter Mills Honorary Symposium,

Ron Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CME, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ron MurrayIndependent CME/CPD Consultant, Pickering, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a tribute to eminent British cardiologist Dr Peter Mills, and one of its long-serving Board members, the European Cardiology Section Foundation (ECSF) presented this symposium in a virtual format,moderated by independent CME/CPD professional Fabiola de Andrade and Reinhard Griebenow, Chairman of the Board of ECSF. The symposium was designed to consider the ongoing ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic and its lsting influence on the way that CME/CPD activities are now being delivered. Presenters from Germany and the United States discussed recent developments in the working environment of healthcare professionals, various aspects of the regulatory and legal issues associated with rapidly changing educational formats such as e-learning, and the enforced move towards more self-directed learning. Key design principles of effective e-learning were also prsented, and examples ofsuccessful micro-e-learning with measured outcomes were provided. In a final discussion period,participants highlighted several concerns such as the integration of this emerging format into different accreditation systems. The main area of concern in this case was thatsuch systems may not yet be fully harmonised. The symposium provided a useful framework for further discussion of how educational activities in CME/CPD could and possibly should, be designed and implemented in the "new normal" of hybrid and e-learning modalities.

Indexed as

conceptualHonoraryhybridmicro-e-learningreflectionregulatory

Identifiers

PMID37123201
PMCPMC10132227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.