ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023
Developing a novel laparoscopic training model during the Covid-19 pandemic in a resource-limited setting.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building Surgical Capacity in Resource-Limited Settings Through Innovative Laparoscopy Training: A Systematic Review of Educational Interventions.World journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Pre-course instructional videos and home-based laparoscopic suturing simulation enhances the educational impact of a laparoscopic training course.Surgery in practice and science · 2023Article
- Implementation of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplications in a Developing South African Pediatric Surgical Service.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This paper describes the development and implementation of a unique laparoscopic suturing course in a resource-constrained setting and reviews the initial experience with the program. Methods: This study describes the development of Grey's laparoscopic suturing course (GLSC) and reviews the questionnaires and feedback over the past year. Results: The GLSC has been run for over a year and has enrolled 47 participants. Most participants were registrars, followed by consultants and medical officers, and most participants had limited minimal access surgery (MAS) experience. Only three had previously undertaken a formal course or observership. The mean result for the pre-course test was 50%, and for the post-course test, 88%. During the skills laboratory session, every participant competently performed intra-corporeal suturing. The entire group unanimously agreed that the GLSC should be recommended for all surgical trainees in the evaluation form. All participants expressed interest in an advanced MAS course. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that developing a local MAS suturing course with limited resources and industry support during the Covid 19 pandemic is possible. It has benefited a large group of trainees thus far and hopefully will become part of the curriculum of surgical trainees in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.