Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123031›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2023

Preliminary Efficacy of Let's Talk Tech: Technology Use Planning for Dementia Care Dyads.

Clara Berridge, Natalie R Turner, Liu Liu, Karen I Fredriksen-Goldsen, Karen S Lyons, George Demiris, Jeffrey Kaye, William B Lober

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clara BerridgeSchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-9556
Natalie R TurnerSchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Liu LiuCollege of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Karen I Fredriksen-GoldsenSchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Karen S LyonsWilliam F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-6057
George DemirisSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-5829
Jeffrey KayeLayton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Center and Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
William B LoberClinical Informatics Research Group, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USBoston College · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066509 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Lynn Bekris · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Engaging older adults with cognitive impairment in planning for technology use in their care: the Identifying Needs for Optimal Remote Monitoring tool (INFORM)K01AG062681 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERRIDGE, CLARA · 2019 to 2022
$495k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG062681NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Care partners of people living with dementia require support to knowledgeably navigate decision making about how and when to use monitoring technologies for care purposes. We conducted a pilot study of a novel self-administered intervention, "Let's Talk Tech," for people living with mild dementia and their care partners. This paper presents preliminary efficacy findings of this intervention designed to educate and facilitate dyadic communication about a range of technologies used in dementia care and to document the preferences of the person living with dementia. It is the first-of-its-kind decision-making and planning tool with a specific focus on technology use. Research Design and Methods: We used a 1-group pretest-post-test design and paired Results: Twenty-nine mild AD dementia care dyads who live together completed the study. There was statistically significant improvement with medium and large effect sizes on outcome measures of care partners' understanding of each technology, care partners' perceptions of the person living with dementia's understanding of each technology, knowledge of the person living with dementia's preferences, decision-making preparedness, and care partners' feelings of mutual understanding. Participants reported that it helped them have important and meaningful conversations about using technology. Discussion and Implications: Let's Talk Tech demonstrated promising preliminary efficacy on targeted measures that can lead to informed, shared decision making about technologies used in dementia care. Future studies should assess efficacy with larger samples and more diverse sample populations in terms of race, ethnicity, and dementia type.

Indexed as

CaregivingDecision makingEthicsInformation TechnologyPerson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID37123031
PMCPMC10132307
OpenAlexW4323044994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.