Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122982›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Enhancing Expert Panel Discussions in Pediatric Palliative Care: Innovative Scenario Development and Summarization With ChatGPT-4.

Mohammed Almazyad, Fahad Aljofan, Noura A Abouammoh, Ruaim Muaygil, Khalid H Malki, Fadi Aljamaan, Abdullah Alturki, Tareq Alayed, Saleh S Alshehri, Abdullah Alrbiaan and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed AlmazyadPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Fahad AljofanPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
Noura A AbouammohDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ruaim MuaygilMedical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid H MalkiDepartment of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Fadi AljamaanCritical Care Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah AlturkiPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
Tareq AlayedPediatric Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
Saleh S AlshehriPediatric Intensive Care Unit, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah AlrbiaanCritical Care Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed AlsatrawiPediatric Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Hazar A TemsahBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, LBN.
Fahad AlsohimePediatric Critical Care Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ali A AlhaboobDepartment of Pediatrics, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Majed AlabdulhafidPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Amr JamalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid AlhasanDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ayman Al-EyadhyPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohamad-Hani TemsahPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a novel approach to enhance expert panel discussions in a medical conference through the use of ChatGPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer version 4), a recently launched powerful artificial intelligence (AI) language model. We report on ChatGPT-4's ability to optimize and summarize the medical conference panel recommendations of the first Pan-Arab Pediatric Palliative Critical Care Hybrid Conference, held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ChatGPT-4 was incorporated into the discussions in two sequential phases: first, scenarios were optimized by the AI model to stimulate in-depth conversations; second, the model identified, summarized, and contrasted key themes from the panel and audience discussions. The results suggest that ChatGPT-4 effectively facilitated complex do-not-resuscitate (DNR) conflict resolution by summarizing key themes such as effective communication, collaboration, patient and family-centered care, trust, and ethical considerations. The inclusion of ChatGPT-4 in pediatric palliative care panel discussions demonstrated potential benefits for enhancing critical thinking among medical professionals. Further research is warranted to validate and broaden these insights across various settings and cultures.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence chatgpt-4chat generative pre-trained transformerdo-not-resuscitate (dnr) conflicts discussionethical considerationsexpert panel discussionshuman-ai scenario developmentmedical conferencespatient and family-centered carepediatric palliative critical carepicu multidisciplinary approach

Identifiers

PMID37122982
PMCPMC10143975
OpenAlexW4367312135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.