Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122955›Full record

ArticleReviews in fish biology and fisheries2023

Initial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Australian fisheries production, research organisations and assessment: shocks, responses and implications for decision support and resilience.

Emily M Ogier, David C Smith, Sian Breen, Caleb Gardner, Daniel J Gaughan, Harry K Gorfine, Alistair J Hobday, Natalie Moltschaniwskyj, Ryan Murphy, Thor Saunders and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Emily M OgierInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6157-5279
David C SmithInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Sian BreenDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD Australia.
Caleb GardnerInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Daniel J GaughanWestern Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, North Beach, WA Australia.
Harry K GorfineFisheries Management and Science Branch, Victorian Fisheries Authority, Queenscliff, VIC Australia.
Alistair J HobdayCentre for Marine Socioecology, Hobart, TAS Australia.
Natalie MoltschaniwskyjDepartment of Primary Industries, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Ryan MurphyAustralian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra, ACT Australia.
Thor SaundersDepartment of Primary Industries, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Mike SteerAquatic and Livestock Sciences Division, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, SA Australia.
James WoodhamsAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra, ACT Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUDepartment of Primary Industries · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AUAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics · AUAustralian Government · AUCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AUGovernment of Western Australia · AUSouth Australian Research and Development Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia's fisheries have experience in responding individually to specific shocks to stock levels (for example, marine heatwaves, floods) and markets (for example, global financial crisis, food safety access barriers). The COVID-19 pandemic was, however, novel in triggering a series of systemic shocks and disruptions to the activities and operating conditions for all Australia's commercial fisheries sectors including those of the research agencies that provide the information needed for their sustainable management. While these disruptions have a single root cause-the public health impacts and containment responses to the COVID-19 pandemic-their transmission and effects have been varied. We examine both the impacts on Australian fisheries triggered by measures introduced by governments both internationally and domestically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, and the countermeasures introduced to support continuity in fisheries and aquaculture production and supply chains. Impacts on fisheries production are identified by comparing annual and monthly catch data for Australia's commercial fisheries in 2020 with averages for the last 4-5 years. We combine this with a survey of the short-term disruption to and impacts on research organisations engaged in fisheries monitoring and assessment and the adaptive measures they deployed. The dominant impact identified was triggered by containment measures both within Australia and in export receiving countries which led to loss of export markets and domestic dine-in markets for live or fresh seafood. The most heavily impact fisheries included lobster and abalone (exported live) and specific finfishes (exported fresh or sold live domestically), which experienced short-term reductions in both production and price. At the same time, improved prices and demand for seafood sold into domestic retail channels were observed. The impacts observed were both a function of the disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the countermeasures and support programs introduced by various national and state-level governments across Australia to at least partly mitigate negative impacts on harvesting activities and supply chains. These included protecting fisheries activities from specific restrictive COVID-19 containment measures, pro-actively re-establishing freight links, supporting quota roll-overs, and introducing wage and businesses support packages. Fisheries research organisations were impacted to various degrees, largely determined by the extent to which their field monitoring activities were protected from specific restrictive COVID-19 containment measures by their state-level governments. Responses of these organisations included reducing fisheries dependent and independent data collection as required while developing strategies to continue to provide assessment services, including opportunistic innovations to harvest data from new data sources. Observed short run impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has emphasised both the vulnerability of fisheries dependent on export markets, live or fresh markets, and long supply chains and the resilience of fisheries research programs. We suggest that further and more comprehensive analysis over a longer time period of the long-run impacts of subsequent waves of variants, extended pandemic containment measures, autonomous and planned adaptive responses would be beneficial for the development of more effective counter measures for when the next major external shock affects Australian fisheries.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicDisruptionFisheries monitoring and assessmentFisheries productionSystemic shock

Identifiers

PMID37122955
PMCPMC9977636
OpenAlexW4322721232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.