ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023
Comparative evaluation of visual analogue scale and pupillary diameter for post-operative pain: An observational study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting and evaluating pain after surgery…Newer methods to the rescue?Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: An objective understanding of pain guides the effectiveness of various postoperative pain management strategies. The measurement of pain by the visual analogue scale (VAS) is dependent on the individual's cognitive and emotional ability. Pupillary dilatation has been successfully used to measure pain in quantitative terms. The present study was conducted to study the correlation between VAS and pupillary diameter in the evaluation of postoperative pain. Methods: This observational study was carried out on 85 patients 18-65 years of age, scheduled for lower abdominal surgical procedures under general anaesthesia. Postoperative pain assessment was done using the VAS at 6 h, 12 h, 18 h and 24 h. In addition, the pupillary diameter of both eyes was measured simultaneously. Paired t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare the data, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the bivariate correlation between VAS score and pupillary diameter. Results: Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of VAS scores at baseline, 6 h, 12 h, 18 h and 24 h postoperatively were 0, 4.88 ± 0.88, 3.39 ± 0.86, 2.19 ± 0.66 and 1.40 ± 0.49, respectively. Mean change was significant at all time intervals ( Conclusion: Change in pupillary diameter correlated well with the pain scores (VAS) and thus pupillary diameter can be chosen as an objective measurement of postoperative pain severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.