Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122882›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2023

Combining Multiple Psychophysiological Measures of Listening Effort: Challenges and Recommendations.

Michael Richter, Tanveer Buhiyan, Lars Bramsløw, Hamish Innes-Brown, Lorenz Fiedler, Lauren V Hadley, Graham Naylor, Gabrielle H Saunders, Dorothea Wendt, William M Whitmer and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael RichterSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Tanveer BuhiyanR&D, Demant A/S, Kongebakken, Denmark.
Lars BramsløwEriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark.
Hamish Innes-BrownEriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark.
Lorenz FiedlerEriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark.
Lauren V HadleyHearing Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Graham NaylorHearing Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Gabrielle H SaundersManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Dorothea WendtEriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark.
William M WhitmerHearing Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Adriana A ZekveldSection of Ear and Hearing, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sophia E KramerSection of Ear and Hearing, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003576/1Medical Research Council MR/X003620/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About one-third of all recently published studies on listening effort have used at least one physiological measure, providing evidence of the popularity of such measures in listening effort research. However, the specific measures employed, as well as the rationales used to justify their inclusion, vary greatly between studies, leading to a literature that is fragmented and difficult to integrate. A unified approach that assesses multiple psychophysiological measures justified by a single rationale would be preferable because it would advance our understanding of listening effort. However, such an approach comes with a number of challenges, including the need to develop a clear definition of listening effort that links to specific physiological measures, customized equipment that enables the simultaneous assessment of multiple measures, awareness of problems caused by the different timescales on which the measures operate, and statistical approaches that minimize the risk of type-I error inflation. This article discusses in detail the various obstacles for combining multiple physiological measures in listening effort research and provides recommendations on how to overcome them.

Indexed as

listening demandlistening effortpsychophysiological measure

Identifiers

PMID37122882
PMCPMC10147512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.