Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122879›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2023

Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Inhibition during a Speech-in-Noise Task in Older Listeners.

David B Ryan, Mark A Eckert, Eric W Sellers, Kim S Schairer, Matthew T McBee, Elizabeth A Ridley, Sherri L Smith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David B RyanHearing and Balance Research Program, James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee.
Mark A EckertDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hearing Research Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, North Carolina.
Eric W SellersDepartment of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.
Kim S SchairerHearing and Balance Research Program, James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee.
Matthew T McBeeDepartment of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.
Elizabeth A RidleyDepartment of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.
Sherri L SmithDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the effect of hearing loss on theta and alpha electroencephalography (EEG) frequency power measures of performance monitoring and cognitive inhibition, respectively, during a speech-in-noise task. It was hypothesized that hearing loss would be associated with an increase in the peak power of theta and alpha frequencies toward easier conditions compared to normal hearing adults. The shift would reflect how hearing loss modulates the recruitment of listening effort to easier listening conditions. Nine older adults with normal hearing (ONH) and 10 older adults with hearing loss (OHL) participated in this study. EEG data were collected from all participants while they completed the words-in-noise task. It hypothesized that hearing loss would also have an effect on theta and alpha power. The ONH group showed an inverted

Indexed as

alpha powerEEGeffortful listeningtheta powerword recognition

Identifiers

PMID37122879
PMCPMC10147504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.