Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Transfer learning-assisted 3D deep learning models for knee osteoarthritis detection: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Pauline Shan Qing Yeoh, Khin Wee Lai, Siew Li Goh, Khairunnisa Hasikin, Xiang Wu, Pei Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ShapeMed-Knee: A Dataset and Neural Shape Model Benchmark for Modeling 3D Femurs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pauline Shan Qing YeohDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khin Wee LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Siew Li GohFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khairunnisa HasikinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Xiang WuSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Pei LiInformation Department, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
University of Malaya · MYXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases and is usually diagnosed with medical imaging techniques. Conventionally, case identification using plain radiography is practiced. However, we acknowledge that knee osteoarthritis is a 3D complexity; hence, magnetic resonance imaging will be the ideal modality to reveal the hidden osteoarthritis features from a three-dimensional view. In this work, the feasibility of well-known convolutional neural network (CNN) structures (ResNet, DenseNet, VGG, and AlexNet) to distinguish knees with and without osteoarthritis (OA) is investigated. Using 3D convolutional layers, we demonstrated the potential of 3D convolutional neural networks of 13 different architectures in knee osteoarthritis diagnosis. We used transfer learning by transforming 2D pre-trained weights into 3D as initial weights for the training of the 3D models. The performance of the models was compared and evaluated based on the performance metrics [balanced accuracy, precision, F1 score, and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve]. This study suggested that transfer learning indeed enhanced the performance of the models, especially for ResNet and DenseNet models. Transfer learning-based models presented promising results, with ResNet34 achieving the best overall accuracy of 0.875 and an F1 score of 0.871. The results also showed that shallow networks yielded better performance than deeper neural networks, demonstrated by ResNet18, DenseNet121, and VGG11 with AUC values of 0.945, 0.914, and 0.928, respectively. This encourages the application of clinical diagnostic aid for knee osteoarthritis using 3DCNN even in limited hardware conditions.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningdisease classificationknee osteoarthritismagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37122858
PMCPMC10136763
OpenAlexW4365455479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.