Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122713›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2023

Remission outcomes in severe eosinophilic asthma with mepolizumab therapy: Analysis of the REDES study.

Ian Pavord, Frances Gardiner, Liam G Heaney, Christian Domingo, Robert G Price, Alison Pullan, John Oppenheimer, Guy Brusselle, Hiroyuki Nagase, Geoffrey Chupp and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early and Sustained Asthma Control and Remission in Real-World Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Benralizumab: XALOC-2.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modifying the course of asthma: mechanisms and strategies for clinical remission.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ian PavordRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Frances GardinerGlobal Medical, Global Specialty and Primary Care Therapy Area, GSK House, Brentford, United Kingdom.
Liam G HeaneyWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Christian DomingoServei de Pneumologia, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Robert G PriceBiostatistics, GSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Alison PullanPlus-Project Partnership Ltd, Knutsford, United Kingdom.
John OppenheimerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Allergy, UMDNJ-Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Guy BrusselleDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hiroyuki NagaseDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Geoffrey ChuppYale Center for Asthma and Airways Disease (YCAAD), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Emilio PizzichiniGlobal Medical, Global Specialty and Primary Care Therapy Area, GSK House, Brentford, United Kingdom.
David Bañas-ConejeroSpecialty Care Medical Department, GSK, Madrid, Spain.
Peter HowarthGlobal Medical, Global Specialty and Primary Care Therapy Area, GSK House, Brentford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical remission as a multicomponent treatment goal in severe asthma is being explored in clinical practice. This Methods: The real-world, retrospective observational REDES study enrolled patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were newly prescribed mepolizumab and with ≥12 months of medical records pre-enrolment. Multicomponent clinical remission was defined as: oral corticosteroid (OCS)-free; exacerbation-free; asthma control test (ACT) score ≥20; and with or without post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≥80%. Baseline characteristics were also assessed in those who did/did not achieve clinical remission. Results: 37% and 30% of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma met our proposed three- and four-component on-treatment clinical remission definitions; an increase from 2% and 3% at baseline. Most frequently achieved individual components of clinical remission were: OCS-free; ACT score ≥20. For patients fulfilling the multicomponent clinical remission definitions, at baseline we observed higher blood eosinophil counts, better ACT scores and lung function, lower maintenance OCS use, and a slightly lower rate of prior exacerbations versus those who did not. Discussion: Clinical remission is a realistic target in clinical practice for a subset of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving mepolizumab. Further studies are required to elucidate whether features linked to the underlying endotype can help predict treatment outcomes, increase rates of clinical remission, and potentially modify disease progression.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaPulmonary EosinophiliaAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansRetrospective StudiesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedmepolizumabclinical outcomeseosinophil biologymepolizumabreal-worldremissionsevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID37122713
PMCPMC10131245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.