ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision Making: A Multi-Center Comparative Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Representation of Rural Older Adults in AI for Health Research: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR human factors · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of the applicability of AI chatbots in addressing health management issues for living kidney donors.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Public trust of AI in healthcare in South Africa: results of a survey.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Multinational Attitudes Toward AI in Health Care and Diagnostics Among Hospital Patients.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Just another tool in their repertoire: uncovering insights into public and patient perspectives on clinicians' use of machine learning in perioperative care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Patient perspectives on AI-based decision support in surgery.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2025Article
- Review
- Empowering health care consumers & understanding patients' perspectives on AI integration in oncology and surgery: A perspective.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Governance and Regulation: An Umbrella Review of Ethical and Policy Dimensions.SAGE open nursingReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Investigate the patient opinion on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Orthopaedics. Methods: 397 orthopaedic patients from a large urban academic center and a rural health system completed a 37-component survey querying patient demographics and perspectives on clinical scenarios involving AI. An average comfort score was calculated from thirteen Likert-scale questions (1, not comfortable; 10, very comfortable). Secondary outcomes requested a binary opinion on whether it is acceptable for patient healthcare data to be used to create AI (yes/no) and the impact of AI on: orthopaedic care (positive/negative); healthcare cost (increase/decrease); and their decision to refuse healthcare if cost increased (yes/no). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were employed to identify characteristics that impacted patient perspectives. Results: The average comfort score across the population was 6.4, with significant bivariate differences between age ( Conclusion: The orthopaedic patient appears comfortable with AI joining the care team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.