ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Trauma care systems in healthcare facilities of an Indian District: Assessment and future directions.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating emergency rescue readiness on Indian national highways: A case study of Jaipur-Jodhpur Highways (India) using a geospatial approach.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With a long-term vision to strengthen the evidence-based trauma care programme in the Kolar district, an objective assessment and grading of the trauma care system (TCS) in public and private hospitals was undertaken. Methods: This cross-sectional assessment used a specifically developed TCS assessment tool to collect data from all Level 2, 3, and 4 hospitals in the Kolar district using a review of records, observation of facilities, and interviews with stakeholders. Data were collected regarding macro areas, human resources, infrastructure, equipment, and drugs in ER, in an objective manner. TCS was scored and compared against criteria set in WHO essential guidelines for Trauma Care. The functioning of TCS was expressed as 'percentage of expected standards' and graded accordingly. Ethical clearance and informed consent were obtained. Results: All available and eligible Level 2, 3, and 4 hospitals in the district (39 hospitals) covering the public and private sector were assessed. TCS in Level 2 and 3 hospitals was functioning at 56% and 59% of expected standards, respectively. TCS was better in Level 4 hospitals, at 83% of expected standards. Scores were lower for macro areas and human resources. Conclusion: TCS in the district is functioning sub-par to expected standards. There is a need for comprehensive strengthening of TCS in both public and private healthcare facilities, especially in macro areas and human resources. Systematic monitoring and periodical TCS assessments are recommended at district levels throughout the country for improved outcomes in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.