Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122536›Full record

SynthesisOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2023

The Diagnostic Power of Circulating miR-1246 in Screening Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Khanh Quang Huynh, Anh Tuan Le, Thang Thanh Phan, Toan Trong Ho, Suong Phuoc Pho, Hang Thuy Nguyen, Binh Thanh Le, Thuc Tri Nguyen, Son Truong Nguyen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khanh Quang HuynhThe Breast Unit, Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1403-0257
Anh Tuan LeDepartment of Chemo-Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Thang Thanh PhanThe Laboratory D Unit, Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-9906
Toan Trong HoThe Laboratory D Unit, Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Suong Phuoc PhoThe Laboratory D Unit, Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Hang Thuy NguyenDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Binh Thanh LeDepartment of General Director, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Thuc Tri NguyenDepartment of General Director, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Son Truong NguyenDepartment of General Director, Cho Ray Hospital, HCMC 700000, Vietnam.
Cho Ray Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: MicroRNA-1246 (miR-1246), an oncomiR that regulates the expression of multiple cancer-related genes, has been attracted and studied as a promising indicator of various tumors. However, diverse conclusions on diagnostic accuracy have been shown due to the small sample size and limited studies included. This meta-analysis is aimed at systematically assessing the performance of extracellular circulating miR-1246 in screening common cancers. Methods: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies until November 28, 2022. Then, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were drawn and calculated area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity values of circulating miR-1246 in the cancer surveillance. Results: After selection and quality assessment, 29 eligible studies with 5914 samples (3232 cases and 2682 controls) enrolled in the final analysis. The pooled AUC, DOR, sensitivity, and specificity of circulating miR-1246 in screening cancers were 0.885 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.827-0.892), 27.7 (95% CI: 17.1-45.0), 84.2% (95% CI: 79.4-88.1), and 85.3% (95% CI: 80.5-89.2), respectively. Among cancer types, superior performance was noted for breast cancer (AUC = 0.950, DOR = 98.5) compared to colorectal cancer (AUC = 0.905, DOR = 47.6), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (AUC = 0.757, DOR = 8.0), hepatocellular carcinoma (AUC = 0.872, DOR = 18.6), pancreatic cancer (AUC = 0.767, DOR = 12.3), and others (AUC = 0.887, DOR = 27.5, Conclusion: Extracellular circulating miR-1246 may serve as a reliable biomarker with good sensitivity and specificity in screening cancers, especially breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCirculating MicroRNAEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsMIRN1246 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID37122536
PMCPMC10139802
OpenAlexW4366596360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.