Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122527›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023

Fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic indices: Essential tools for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Amine Mamoun Boutaleb, Chadi Ghafari, Claudiu Ungureanu, Stéphane Carlier

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amine Mamoun BoutalebDepartment of Cardiology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca 20230, Casablanca, Morocco.
Chadi GhafariDepartment of Cardiology, University of Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium.
Claudiu UngureanuDepartment of Cardiology, University of Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium.
Stéphane CarlierDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Mons 7000, Belgium.
CHU Ambroise Paré · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamical evaluation of a coronary artery lesion is an important diagnostic step to assess its functional impact. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) received a class IA recommendation from the European Society of Cardiology for the assessment of angiographically moderate stenosis. FFR evaluation of coronary artery disease offers improvement of the therapeutic strategy, deferring unnecessary procedures for lesions with a FFR > 0.8, improving patients' management and clinical outcome. Post intervention, an optimal FFR > 0.9 post stenting should be reached and > 0.8 post drug eluting balloons. Non-hyperemic pressure ratio measurements have been validated in previous studies with a common threshold of 0.89. They might overestimate the hemodynamic significance of some lesions but remain useful whenever hyperemic agents are contraindicated. FFR remains the gold standard reference for invasive assessment of ischemia. We illustrate this review with two cases introducing the possibility to estimate also non-invasively FFR from reconstructed 3-D angiograms by quantitative flow ratio. We conclude introducing a hybrid approach to intermediate lesions (DFR 0.85-0.95) potentially maximizing clinical decision from all measurements.

Indexed as

Coronary artery physiologyFractional flow measurementsNon-hyperemic pressure ratiosQuantitative flow reserve

Identifiers

PMID37122527
PMCPMC10131021
OpenAlexW4361280200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.