Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122479›Full record

ArticleScientific African2023

A convenient approach for knee kinematics assessment using wearable inertial sensors during home-based rehabilitation: Validation with an optoelectronic system.

Mohamed El Fezazi, Abdelouahad Achmamad, Atman Jbari, Abdelilah Jilbab

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific African, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed El FezaziElectronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.
Abdelouahad AchmamadElectronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.
Atman JbariElectronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.
Abdelilah JilbabElectronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.
Mohammed V University · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation services are among the most severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has increased the number of people not receiving the needed rehabilitation care. Home-based rehabilitation becomes alternative support to face this greater need. However, monitoring kinematics parameters during rehabilitation exercises is critical for an effective recovery. This work proposes a detailed framework to estimate knee kinematics using a wearable Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU). That allows at-home monitoring for knee rehabilitation progress. Two MIMU sensors were attached to the shank and thigh segments respectively. First, the absolute orientation of each sensor was estimated using a sensor fusion algorithm. Second, these sensor orientations were transformed to segments orientations using a functional sensor-to-segment (STS) alignment. Third, the relative orientation between segments, i.e., knee joint angle, was computed and the relevant kinematics parameters were extracted. Then, the validity of our approach was evaluated with a gold-standard optoelectronic system. Seven participants completed three to five Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) tests. The estimated knee angle was compared to the reference angle. Root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were considered as evaluation metrics. Our results showed reasonable accuracy (RMSE < 8°), strong to very-strong correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.86), a mean difference within 1.1°, and agreement limits from -16° to 14°. In addition, no significant difference was found (

Indexed as

E-health rehabilitationHuman motion estimationInertial sensor fusionTelemedicineWearable system

Identifiers

PMID37122479
PMCPMC10122771
OpenAlexW4366778966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.