SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023
Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Receptor tyrosine kinase targeted therapies in glioblastoma: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Tubular retractors in neuro-oncological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Exercise-associated microRNA programs as candidate modulators and biomarkers in glioblastoma: a narrative review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Clinical application ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Citronellol silver nanoconjugates as a therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma through computational and experimental evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Towards non-invasive diagnosis of glioblastoma: identifying metabolic biomarkers in liquid biopsies using a ROC-based approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Impact of intensity standardisation and ComBat batch size on clinical-radiomic prognostic models performance in a multi-centre study of patients with glioblastoma.European radiology · 2025Article
- New approaches to targeted drug therapy of intracranial tumors.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Unravelling the mosaic: Epigenetic diversity in glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2024Review
- Amino acid metabolism in glioma: in vivo MR-spectroscopic detection of alanine as a potential biomarker of poor survival in glioma patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- The role of ALDH1A1 in glioblastoma proliferation and invasion.Chemico-biological interactions · 2024Article
- Glioblastoma mesenchymal subtype enhances antioxidant defence to reduce susceptibility to ferroptosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Brain Tumor Care: Emerging Technologies and Strategies.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- New Avenues and Major Achievements in Phytocompounds Research for Glioblastoma Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Current and future genomic applications for surgeons.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024Review
- Article
- Intrinsic and Microenvironmental Drivers of Glioblastoma Invasion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Systemic and local immunosuppression in glioblastoma and its prognostic significance.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour with median survival of 14.6 months. Personalised medicine aims to improve survival by targeting individualised patient characteristics. However, a major limitation has been application of targeted therapies in a non-personalised manner without biomarker enrichment. This has risked therapies being discounted without fair and rigorous evaluation. The objective was therefore to synthesise the current evidence on survival efficacy of personalised therapies in glioblastoma. Methods: Studies reporting a survival outcome in human adults with supratentorial glioblastoma were eligible. PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched to 5th May 2022. Clinicaltrials.gov was searched to 25th May 2022. Reference lists were hand-searched. Duplicate title/abstract screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were conducted. A quantitative synthesis is presented. Results: A total of 102 trials were included: 16 were randomised and 41 studied newly diagnosed patients. Of 5,527 included patients, 59.4% were male and mean age was 53.7 years. More than 20 types of personalised therapy were included: targeted molecular therapies were the most studied (33.3%, 34/102), followed by autologous dendritic cell vaccines (32.4%, 33/102) and autologous tumour vaccines (10.8%, 11/102). There was no consistent evidence for survival efficacy of any personalised therapy. Conclusion: Personalised glioblastoma therapies remain of unproven survival benefit. Evidence is inconsistent with high risk of bias. Nonetheless, encouraging results in some trials provide reason for optimism. Future focus should address target-enriched trials, combination therapies, longitudinal biomarker monitoring and standardised reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.