Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122254›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Assessing the impact of fire on spiders through a global comparative analysis.

Claire A McLean, Jane Melville, Joseph Schubert, Rebecca Rose, Iliana Medina

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire A McLeanSciences Department, Museums Victoria, 11 Nicholson Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6855-5067
Jane MelvilleSciences Department, Museums Victoria, 11 Nicholson Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-6423
Joseph SchubertSciences Department, Museums Victoria, 11 Nicholson Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Rebecca RoseSciences Department, Museums Victoria, 11 Nicholson Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Iliana MedinaSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1021-5035
Museums Victoria · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many regions fire regimes are changing due to anthropogenic factors. Understanding the responses of species to fire can help to develop predictive models and inform fire management decisions. Spiders are a diverse and ubiquitous group and can offer important insights into the impacts of fire on invertebrates and whether these depend on environmental factors, phylogenetic history or functional traits. We conducted phylogenetic comparative analyses of data from studies investigating the impacts of fire on spiders. We investigated whether fire affects spider abundance or presence and whether ecologically relevant traits or site-specific factors influence species' responses to fire. Although difficult to make broad generalizations about the impacts of fire due to variation in site- and fire-specific factors, we find evidence that short fire intervals may be a threat to some spiders, and that fire affects abundance and species compositions in forests relative to other vegetation types. Orb and sheet web weavers were also more likely to be absent after fire than ambush hunters, ground hunters and other hunters suggesting functional traits may affect responses. Finally, we show that analyses of published data can be used to detect broad-scale patterns and provide an alternative to traditional meta-analytical approaches.

Indexed as

FiresSpidersAnimalsEcosystemForestsPhylogenyAraneaeburninvertebratephylogenetic signaltime since firetrait-based approach

Identifiers

PMID37122254
PMCPMC10130718
OpenAlexW4367052988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.