ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2023
Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning models for predicting postoperative delirium in non-cardiac surgery patients - systematic review and meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based prediction models for postoperative delirium: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting ICU Delirium in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Using Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Admission Data: A Machine Learning Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Delirium in Intensive Care Units Using Continuous Physiological Data: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of machine learning-based predictive model for colorectal polyp recurrence one year after endoscopic mucosal resection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Red cell distribution width: a potential marker of reduced femoral neck bone mineral density in men and postmenopausal women.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Frailty prediction in patients with chronic digestive system diseases: based on multi-task learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Postoperative recurrence prediction model for perianal abscess using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for coronary heart disease risk in depressed patients aged 20 years and older using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsMachine learning-based identification of key variables and prediction of postoperative delirium in patients with extensive burns.
methodsFive hundred and eighteen patients with extensive burns who underwent surgery were included and randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to screen for significant variables. Nine prediction models were constructed in the training and validation sets (80% of dataset). The testing set (20% of dataset) was used to further evaluate the model. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to compare model performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the best one and to externally validate it in another large tertiary hospital.
resultsSeven variables were used in the development of nine prediction models: physical restraint, diabetes, sex, preoperative hemoglobin, acute physiological and chronic health assessment, time in the Burn Intensive Care Unit and total body surface area. Random Forest (RF) outperformed the other eight models in terms of predictive performance (ROC:84.00%) When external validation was performed, RF performed well (accuracy: 77.12%, sensitivity: 67.74% and specificity: 80.46%).
conclusionThe first machine learning-based delirium prediction model for patients with extensive burns was successfully developed and validated. High-risk patients for delirium can be effectively identified and targeted interventions can be made to reduce the incidence of delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.