Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122154›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2023

Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery.

Yujie Ren, Yu Zhang, Jianhua Zhan, Junfeng Sun, Jinhua Luo, Wenqiang Liao, Xing Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yujie RenMedical Center of Burn Plastic and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6964-8735
Yu ZhangMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-0466
Jianhua ZhanMedical Center of Burn Plastic and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Junfeng SunMedical Center of Burns and Plastic, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, China.
Jinhua LuoMedical Center of Burn Plastic and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wenqiang LiaoMedical Center of Burn Plastic and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xing ChengMedical Center of Burn Plastic and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMachine learning-based identification of key variables and prediction of postoperative delirium in patients with extensive burns.

methodsFive hundred and eighteen patients with extensive burns who underwent surgery were included and randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to screen for significant variables. Nine prediction models were constructed in the training and validation sets (80% of dataset). The testing set (20% of dataset) was used to further evaluate the model. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to compare model performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the best one and to externally validate it in another large tertiary hospital.

resultsSeven variables were used in the development of nine prediction models: physical restraint, diabetes, sex, preoperative hemoglobin, acute physiological and chronic health assessment, time in the Burn Intensive Care Unit and total body surface area. Random Forest (RF) outperformed the other eight models in terms of predictive performance (ROC:84.00%) When external validation was performed, RF performed well (accuracy: 77.12%, sensitivity: 67.74% and specificity: 80.46%).

conclusionThe first machine learning-based delirium prediction model for patients with extensive burns was successfully developed and validated. High-risk patients for delirium can be effectively identified and targeted interventions can be made to reduce the incidence of delirium.

Indexed as

DeliriumIntensive Care UnitsHumansMachine LearningRandom Forestdeliriumextensive burnsexternal validationmachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID37122154
PMCPMC10493655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.