Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122152›Full record

ReviewGut microbes

Probiotics to improve the gut microbiome in premature infants: are we there yet?

Emily M Mercer, Marie-Claire Arrieta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Navigating the United States FDA advisory: Probiotics in Preterm Infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  11. The Gut in Early Life-Postnatal Challenges.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health benefits ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily M MercerDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marie-Claire ArrietaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR MRT-168048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiome maturation in infants born prematurely is uniquely influenced by the physiological, clinical, and environmental factors surrounding preterm birth and early life, leading to altered patterns of microbial succession relative to term infants during the first months of life. These differences in microbiome composition are implicated in acute clinical conditions that disproportionately affect preterm infants, including necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS). Probiotic supplementation initiated early in life is an effective prophylactic measure for preventing NEC, LOS, and other clinical concerns relevant to preterm infants. In parallel, reported benefits of probiotics on the preterm gut microbiome, metabolome, and immune function are beginning to emerge. This review summarizes the current literature on the influence of probiotics on the gut microbiome of preterm infants, outlines potential mechanisms by which these effects are exerted, and highlights important clinical considerations for determining the best practices for probiotic use in premature infants.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingGastrointestinal MicrobiomePremature BirthProbioticsSepsisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Prematureearly lifeGut microbiomemicrobial successionmicrobiome maturationneonatal intensive careprematuritypreterm infantsprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID37122152
PMCPMC10153018
OpenAlexW4367554797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.