Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122009›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

Boosting genome editing efficiency in human cells and plants with novel LbCas12a variants.

Liyang Zhang, Gen Li, Yingxiao Zhang, Yanhao Cheng, Nathaniel Roberts, Steve E Glenn, Diane DeZwaan-McCabe, H Tomas Rube, Jeff Manthey, Gary Coleman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Liyang Zhang *Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, 52241, USA.
Gen Li *Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Yingxiao Zhang *Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Yanhao ChengDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Nathaniel RobertsIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, 52241, USA.
Steve E GlennIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, 52241, USA.
Diane DeZwaan-McCabeIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, 52241, USA.
H Tomas RubeDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
Jeff MantheyIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, 52241, USA.
Gary ColemanDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Christopher A VakulskasIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, 52241, USA. cvakulskas@idtdna.com.
Yiping QiDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. yiping@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-6706
Integrated DNA Technologies (United States) · USAdvanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USAncient Egypt Research Associates · USSyngenta (United States) · USUniversity of California, Merced · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCas12a (formerly known as Cpf1), the class II type V CRISPR nuclease, has been widely used for genome editing in mammalian cells and plants due to its distinct characteristics from Cas9. Despite being one of the most robust Cas12a nucleases, LbCas12a in general is less efficient than SpCas9 for genome editing in human cells, animals, and plants.

resultsTo improve the editing efficiency of LbCas12a, we conduct saturation mutagenesis in E. coli and identify 1977 positive point mutations of LbCas12a. We selectively assess the editing efficiency of 56 LbCas12a variants in human cells, identifying an optimal LbCas12a variant (RVQ: G146R/R182V/E795Q) with the most robust editing activity. We further test LbCas12a-RV, LbCas12a-RRV, and LbCas12a-RVQ in plants and find LbCas12a-RV has robust editing activity in rice and tomato protoplasts. Interestingly, LbCas12a-RRV, resulting from the stacking of RV and D156R, displays improved editing efficiency in stably transformed rice and poplar plants, leading to up to 100% editing efficiency in T

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that LbCas12a-RVQ is a powerful tool for genome editing in human cells while LbCas12a-RRV confers robust genome editing in plants. Our study reveals the tremendous potential of these LbCas12a variants for advancing precision genome editing applications across a wide range of organisms.

Indexed as

Gene EditingOryzaAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEndonucleasesEscherichia coliGenome, PlantHumansMammalsMutagenesisEndonucleasesGenome editingHuman cellsLbCas12a-RRVLbCas12a-RVLbCas12a-RVQPoplarProtein evolutionRiceTomato

Identifiers

PMID37122009
PMCPMC10150537
OpenAlexW4367555713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.