ArticleProgress in orthodontics2023
Accurate gingival segmentation from 3D images with artificial intelligence: an animal pilot study.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel fluoride tray-assisted workflow for artificial intelligence-driven automated maxillary gingival segmentation on cone beam CT.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- SMAXI: a machine-learning-powered open-source software for multidimensional full-field X-ray image analysis.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Supracrestal Tissue Height Changes Around the Healing Abutment in the Posterior Region After Second-Stage Implant Surgery Measured by Intraoral Scanning: A Retrospective Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Q-Bone system: an intelligent quantitative system for alveolar bone loss to assist the diagnosis of periodontitis - model development and validation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Diagnosis of Periodontal/Peri-Implant Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Automated periodontal assessment in orthodontic patients: a dual CNN framework.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Efficiency of oral keratinized gingiva detection and measurement based on convolutional neural network.Journal of periodontology · 2025Article
- AI-driven dynamic orthodontic treatment management: personalized progress tracking and adjustments-a narrative review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
- The anticancer activity and mechanisms of She medicine herbs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Clinical-oriented 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of gingival thickness using convolutional neural networks and CBCT.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Thermographic examination of gingival phenotypes: correlation between morphological and thermal parameters.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGingival phenotype plays an important role in dental diagnosis and treatment planning. Traditionally, determining the gingival phenotype is done by manual probing of the gingival soft tissues, an invasive and time-consuming procedure. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of an alternatively novel, non-invasive technology based on the precise 3-dimension (3D) soft tissue reconstruction from intraoral scanning and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to predict the gingival biotype.
methodsAs a proof-of-concept, Yorkshire pig mandibles were scanned, and the CBCT data were fed into a deep-learning model to reconstruct the teeth and surrounding bone structure in 3D. By overlaying the CBCT scan with the intraoral scans, an accurate superposition was created and used for virtual measurements of the soft tissue thickness. Meanwhile, gingival thicknesses were also measured by a periodontal probe and digital caliper on the buccal and lingual sides at 3 mm apical to the gingival margin of the posterior teeth and compared with the virtual assessment at the same location. The data obtained from virtual and clinical measurements were compared by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank analysis, while their correlation was determined by Pearson's r value. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for intergroup comparisons of the amount of difference.
resultsAmong 108 investigated locations, the clinical and virtual measurements are strongly positively correlated (r = 0.9656, P < 0.0001), and only clinically insignificant differences (0.066 ± 0.223 mm) were observed between the two assessments. There is no difference in the agreement between the virtual and clinical measurements on sexually matured samples (0.087 ± 0.240 mm) and pre-pubertal samples (0.033 ± 0.195 mm). Noticeably, there is a greater agreement between the virtual and clinical measurements at the buccal sites (0.019 ± 0.233 mm) than at the lingual sites (0.116 ± 0.215 mm).
conclusionIn summary, the artificial intelligence-based virtual measurement proposed in this work provides an innovative technique potentially for accurately measuring soft tissue thickness using clinical routine 3D imaging systems, which will aid clinicians in generating a more comprehensive diagnosis with less invasive procedures and, in turn, optimize the treatment plans with more predictable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.