Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37121533›Full record

Trial reportArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2023

Pressure Injury Data Reconciliation in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jeanine Blanchard, Cheryl Vigen, Trudy Mallinson, Mike Carlson, Susan L Garber, Barbara Bates-Jensen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeanine BlanchardChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: jeanine@chan.usc.edu.
Cheryl VigenChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Trudy MallinsonChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Mike CarlsonChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Susan L GarberH. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Barbara Bates-JensenSchool of Nursing and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

LIFESTYLE REDESIGN FOR PRESSURE ULCER PREVENTION IN SCIR01HD056267 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CLARK, FLORENCE A. · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo advance pressure injury (PrI) research in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) by describing lessons learned and recommendations for future research, ultimately promoting PrI prevention and more effective wound care. This paper describes the detailed procedures undertaken to collect and reconcile PrI data and summarizes the types of discrepancies identified.

designSecondary analyses of PrI data collected between 2009 and 2014 in a randomized controlled trial (parent study).

settingParticipants in the parent study were recruited from a large rehabilitation center in the Los Angeles area that serves primarily individuals with limited resources.

participants232 participants with SCI and a history of 1 or more medically serious PrI (MSPrI) in the previous 5 years.

interventionsParticipants in the parent study were randomized to a 12-month PrI prevention intervention led by an occupational therapist, or to usual care.

main outcome measuresRelations among PrI characteristics, data sources (phone interviews, skin checks, paper and electronic medical records [MRs]), and treatment condition, and sensitivity of 6 different data sources in detecting MSPrIs.

resultsThe majority (62%) of MSPrIs were in the pelvic region. MRs detected 82% of the MSPrIs overall, making it the most sensitive data source, and scheduled skin checks were the second-most sensitive data source, finding 37% of the MSPrIs.

conclusionsMR review is the preferred method for ascertaining MSPrIs in clinical trials of interventions designed to reduce the incidence of these injuries. When multiple sources of information are used, careful reconciliation of reports is necessary to ensure accuracy.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansOccupational TherapistsPressure injuryPressure ulcerRehabilitationResearch designSpinal cord injuries

Identifiers

PMID37121533
PMCPMC10611896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.