ArticleNeuroImage2023
The integration of continuous audio and visual speech in a cocktail-party environment depends on attention.
Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of multisensory simultaneity judgment training on the comprehension and cortical processing of speech in noise: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Top-Down Attention Modulates Phase Effects on Audio-Tactile Processing.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Toward fMRI-based hyperscanning in the study of the cocktail-party effect.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Faster to react, slower to move: differential effects of multisensory facilitation on movement initiation and execution across the adult lifespan.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Neural Speech Tracking during Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Primitive audiovisual integration of speech.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Dynamic modeling of EEG responses to natural speech reveals earlier processing of predictable words.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Anatomically distinct cortical tracking of music and speech by slow (1-8Hz) and fast (70-120Hz) oscillatory activity.PloS one · 2025Article
- The impact of face masks on face-to-face neural tracking of speech: Auditory and visual obstacles.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Attention Drives Visual Processing and Audiovisual Integration During Multimodal Communication.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- The effect of gaze on EEG measures of multisensory integration in a cocktail party scenario.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Dissociable Neural Correlates of Multisensory Coherence and Selective Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- The effect of gaze on EEG measures of multisensory integration in a cocktail party scenario.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Increases in sensory noise predict attentional disruptions to audiovisual speech perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In noisy environments, our ability to understand speech benefits greatly from seeing the speaker's face. This is attributed to the brain's ability to integrate audio and visual information, a process known as multisensory integration. In addition, selective attention plays an enormous role in what we understand, the so-called cocktail-party phenomenon. But how attention and multisensory integration interact remains incompletely understood, particularly in the case of natural, continuous speech. Here, we addressed this issue by analyzing EEG data recorded from participants who undertook a multisensory cocktail-party task using natural speech. To assess multisensory integration, we modeled the EEG responses to the speech in two ways. The first assumed that audiovisual speech processing is simply a linear combination of audio speech processing and visual speech processing (i.e., an A + V model), while the second allows for the possibility of audiovisual interactions (i.e., an AV model). Applying these models to the data revealed that EEG responses to attended audiovisual speech were better explained by an AV model, providing evidence for multisensory integration. In contrast, unattended audiovisual speech responses were best captured using an A + V model, suggesting that multisensory integration is suppressed for unattended speech. Follow up analyses revealed some limited evidence for early multisensory integration of unattended AV speech, with no integration occurring at later levels of processing. We take these findings as evidence that the integration of natural audio and visual speech occurs at multiple levels of processing in the brain, each of which can be differentially affected by attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.