ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023
Comparative genomics between matched solid and lepidic portions of semi-solid lung adenocarcinomas.
Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- CEACAM5 as a biomarker of semi-solid, lepidic lung adenocarcinoma.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- The role of growth heterogeneity in solid nodular non-small cell lung cancer in clinical practice: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- The Landscape of CEACAM5 Expression by Immunohistochemistry in NSCLC.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Pathological Features and Differential Efficacy of Cisplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025Article
- Sex-based differences in CEACAM5 expression in lung cancer.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Proteomic profiling reveals CEACAM6 function in driving gallbladder cancer aggressiveness through integrin receptor, PRKCD and AKT/ERK signaling.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenetic changes that drive the transition from lepidic to invasive cancer development within a radiographic ground glass or semi-solid lung lesion (SSL) are not well understood. Biomarkers to predict the transition to solid, invasive cancer within SSL are needed.
methodsPatients with surgically resected SSL were identified retrospectively from a surgical database. Clinical characteristics and survival were compared between stage I SSL (n = 65) and solid adenocarcinomas (n = 120) resected during the same time period. Areas of normal lung, in situ lepidic, and invasive solid tumor were microdissected from within the same SSL specimens and next generation sequencing (NGS) and Affymetrix microarray of gene expression were performed.
resultsThere were more never smokers, Asian patients, and sub-lobar resections among SSL but no difference in 5-year survival between SSL and solid adenocarcinoma. Driver mutations found in both lepidic and solid invasive portion were EGFR (43%), KRAS (21%), and DNMT3A (5%). CEACAM5 was the most upregulated gene found in solid, invasive portions of SSL. Lepidic and invasive solid areas had many similarities in gene expression, however there were some significant differences with the gene SPP1 being a unique biomarker for the invasive component of a SSL.
conclusionsCommon lung cancer driver mutations are present in in situ lepidic as well as invasive solid portions of a SSL, suggesting early development of driver mutations. CEACAM5 and SPP1 emerged as promising biomarkers of invasive potential in semi-solid lesions. Other studies have shown both genes to correlate with poor prognosis in lung cancer and their role in evolution of semi-solid lung lesions warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.