Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37120794›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Quadriceps and hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ only marginally in function after the rehabilitation: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

Daniel Niederer, Matthias Keller, Sarah Jakob, Wolf Petersen, Natalie Mengis, Lutz Vogt, Daniel Guenther, Georg Brandl, Björn H Drews, Michael Behringer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel NiedererInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. niederer@sport.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-5418
Matthias KellerOSINSTITUT Ortho and Sport, Munich, Germany.
Sarah JakobDepartment of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Wolf PetersenKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Berlin, Germany.
Natalie MengisArcus Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.
Lutz VogtDepartment of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Daniel GuentherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery, and Sports Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Georg BrandlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery II, Herz-Jesu Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria.
Björn H DrewsSt. Vinzenz Clinic Allgäu, Pfronten, Germany.
Michael BehringerDepartment of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David A GronebergInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas SteinSPORTHOLOGICUM Frankfurt-Center for Sport and Joint Injuries, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitute for Sports Medicine · DEKlinik Hietzing · ATSt. Vinzenz Kliniken Pfronten im Allgäu · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine potential quadriceps versus hamstring tendon autograft differences in neuromuscular function and return to sport (RTS)-success in participants after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

methodsCase-control study on 25 participants operated on with an arthroscopically assisted, anatomic ipsilateral quadriceps femoris tendon graft and two control groups of 25 participants each, operated on with a semitendinosus tendon or semitendinosus-gracilis (hamstring) tendon graft ACL reconstruction. Participants of the two control groups were propensity score matched to the case group based on sex, age, Tegner activity scale and either the total volume of rehabilitation since reconstruction (n = 25) or the time since reconstruction (n = 25). At the end of the rehabilitation (averagely 8 months post-reconstruction), self-reported knee function (KOOS sum scores), fear of loading the reconstructed knee during a sporting activity (RSI-ACL questionnaire), and fear of movement (Tampa scale of kinesiophobia) were followed by hop and jump tests. Front hops for distance (jumping distance as the outcome) were followed by Drop jumps (normalised knee joint separation distance), and concluded by qualitative ratings of the Balanced front and side hops. Between-group comparisons were undertaken using 95% confidence intervals comparisons, effect sizes were calculated.

resultsThe quadriceps case group (always compared with the rehabilitation-matched hamstring graft controls first and versus time-matched hamstring graft controls second) had non-significant and only marginal higher self-reported issues during sporting activities: Cohen's d = 0.42, d = 0.44, lower confidence for RTS (d = - 0.30, d = - 0.16), and less kinesiophobia (d =  - 0.25, d = 0.32). Small and once more non-significant effect sizes point towards lower values in the quadriceps graft groups in the Front hop for distance limb symmetry values in comparison to the two hamstring control groups (d =  - 0.24, d = - 0.35). The normalised knee joint separation distance were non-significantly and small effect sized higher in the quadriceps than in the hamstring groups (d = 0.31, d = 0.28).

conclusionOnly non-significant and marginal between-graft differences in the functional outcomes at the end of the rehabilitation occurred. The selection of either a hamstring or a quadriceps graft type cannot be recommended based on the results. The decision must be undertaken individually. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring MusclesHamstring TendonsAutograftsCase-Control StudiesHumansPropensity ScoreQuadriceps MuscleAutograftFunctional capacityPropensity scoreReturn to sports

Identifiers

PMID37120794
PMCPMC10149044
OpenAlexW4367394315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.