ArticleCommunications biology2023
RNA-DNA interactomes of three prokaryotes uncovered by proximity ligation.
Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximity ligation approaches, which are widely used to study the spatial organization of the genome, also make it possible to reveal patterns of RNA-DNA interactions. Here, we use RedC, an RNA-DNA proximity ligation approach, to assess the distribution of major RNA types along the genomes of E. coli, B. subtilis, and thermophilic archaeon T. adornatum. We find that (i) messenger RNAs preferentially interact with their cognate genes and the genes located downstream in the same operon, which is consistent with polycistronic transcription; (ii) ribosomal RNAs preferentially interact with active protein-coding genes in both bacteria and archaea, indicating co-transcriptional translation; and (iii) 6S noncoding RNA, a negative regulator of bacterial transcription, is depleted from active genes in E. coli and B. subtilis. We conclude that the RedC data provide a rich resource for studying both transcription dynamics and the function of noncoding RNAs in microbial organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.