Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37120519›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

Data-driven characterization of walking after a spinal cord injury using inertial sensors.

Charlotte Werner, Meltem Gönel, Irina Lerch, Armin Curt, László Demkó

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gait analysis methods in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Rethinking Movement: From Capacity to Context.Kinesiology review (Champaign, Ill.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Center of Mass Estimation for Impaired Gait Assessment Using Inertial Measurement Units.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte Werner *Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. Charlotte.Werner@hest.ethz.ch.
Meltem Gönel *Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Irina LerchSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Armin CurtSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
László DemkóSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) refers to remaining sensorimotor function below the injury with the possibility for the patient to regain walking abilities. However, these patients often suffer from diverse gait deficits, which are not objectively assessed in the current clinical routine. Wearable inertial sensors are a promising tool to capture gait patterns objectively and started to gain ground for other neurological disorders such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. In this work, we present a data-driven approach to assess walking for SCI patients based on sensor-derived outcome measures. We aimed to (i) characterize their walking pattern in more depth by identifying groups with similar walking characteristics and (ii) use sensor-derived gait parameters as predictors for future walking capacity.

methodsThe dataset analyzed consisted of 66 SCI patients and 20 healthy controls performing a standardized gait test, namely the 6-min walking test (6MWT), while wearing a sparse sensor setup of one sensor attached to each ankle. A data-driven approach has been followed using statistical methods and machine learning models to identify relevant and non-redundant gait parameters.

resultsClustering resulted in 4 groups of patients that were compared to each other and to the healthy controls. The clusters did differ in terms of their average walking speed but also in terms of more qualitative gait parameters such as variability or parameters indicating compensatory movements. Further, using longitudinal data from a subset of patients that performed the 6MWT several times during their rehabilitation, a prediction model has been trained to estimate whether the patient's walking speed will improve significantly in the future. Including sensor-derived gait parameters as inputs for the prediction model resulted in an accuracy of 80%, which is a considerable improvement of 10% compared to using only the days since injury, the present 6MWT distance, and the days until the next 6MWT as predictors.

conclusionsIn summary, the work presented proves that sensor-derived gait parameters provide additional information on walking characteristics and thus are beneficial to complement clinical walking assessments of SCI patients. This work is a step towards a more deficit-oriented therapy and paves the way for better rehabilitation outcome predictions.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesWalkingGaitHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareWalking SpeedDigital healthGait analysisInertial sensorsRehabilitationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID37120519
PMCPMC10149024
OpenAlexW4367368112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.