ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Evaluation of single-stage vision models for pose estimation of surgical instruments.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence integration in surgery through hand and instrument tracking: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMultiple applications in open surgical environments may benefit from adoption of markerless computer vision depending on associated speed and accuracy requirements. The current work evaluates vision models for 6-degree of freedom pose estimation of surgical instruments in RGB scenes. Potential use cases are discussed based on observed performance.
methodsConvolutional neural nets were developed with simulated training data for 6-degree of freedom pose estimation of a representative surgical instrument in RGB scenes. Trained models were evaluated with simulated and real-world scenes. Real-world scenes were produced by using a robotic manipulator to procedurally generate a wide range of object poses.
resultsCNNs trained in simulation transferred to real-world evaluation scenes with a mild decrease in pose accuracy. Model performance was sensitive to input image resolution and orientation prediction format. The model with highest accuracy demonstrated mean in-plane translation error of 13 mm and mean long axis orientation error of 5[Formula: see text] in simulated evaluation scenes. Similar errors of 29 mm and 8[Formula: see text] were observed in real-world scenes.
conclusion6-DoF pose estimators can predict object pose in RGB scenes with real-time inference speed. Observed pose accuracy suggests that applications such as coarse-grained guidance, surgical skill evaluation, or instrument tracking for tray optimization may benefit from markerless pose estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37120481What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.