Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37120448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Preliminary investigation on the effect of insect-based chitosan on preservation of coated fresh cherry tomatoes.

Elena Tafi, Micaela Triunfo, Anna Guarnieri, Dolores Ianniciello, Rosanna Salvia, Carmen Scieuzo, Annamaria Ranieri, Antonella Castagna, Samuel Lepuri, Thomas Hahn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AnRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Peptide Fractions Extracted from the Hemolymph ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Larval Frass ofInsects · 2024
    Review
  11. iScience · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elena TafiDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Micaela TriunfoDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Anna GuarnieriDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Dolores IannicielloDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Rosanna SalviaDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy. r.salvia@unibas.it.
Carmen ScieuzoDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Annamaria RanieriDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonella CastagnaDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. antonella.castagna@unipi.it.
Samuel LepuriDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Thomas HahnFraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Susanne ZibekFraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Angela De BonisDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Patrizia FalabellaDepartment of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy. patrizia.falabella@unibas.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitosan was produced from Hermetia illucens pupal exuviae by heterogeneous and homogeneous deacetylation. Tomato fruits (Solanum lycopersicum), that are one of the most grown and consumed food throughout the world, were coated with 0.5 and 1% chitosan, applied by dipping or spraying, and stored at room temperature or 4 °C, for a storage period of 30 days. Statistical analysis give different results depending on the analysed parameters: heterogeneous chitosan, indeed, had a better effect than the homogenous one in maintaining more stable physico-chemical parameters, while the homogenous chitosan improved the total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity. Chitosan coatings applied by spraying were more effective in all the analyses. Chitosan derived from H. illucens always performed similarly to the commercial chitosan. However, a general better performance of insect-derived chitosan on the concentration of phenolics and flavonoids, and the antioxidant activity was observed as compared to the commercial one. Chitosan coating has already been successfully used for preservation of fresh fruits, as alternative to synthetic polymers, but this is the first investigation of chitosan produced from an insect for this application. These preliminary results are encouraging regarding the validation of the insect H. illucens as a source of chitosan.

Indexed as

ChitosanDipteraSolanum lycopersicumAnimalsAntioxidantsFlavonoidsFood PreservationFruitAntioxidantsChitosanFlavonoids

Identifiers

PMID37120448
PMCPMC10148861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.