Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37120444›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

STING is a prognostic factor related to tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, and distant metastasis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Stefano Marletta, Anna Caliò, Giuseppe Bogina, Mimma Rizzo, Matteo Brunelli, Serena Pedron, Lisa Marcolini, Lavinia Stefanizzi, Stefano Gobbo, Alessandro Princiotta and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano Marletta *Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Anna Caliò *Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe BoginaDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Mimma RizzoDivision of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Serena PedronDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Lisa MarcoliniDepartment of Pathology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Lavinia StefanizziDepartment of Pathology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Stefano GobboDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandro PrinciottaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Camillo PortaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "A. Moro,", Bari, Italy.
Angela PecoraroDepartment of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Guido MartignoniDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. guido.martignoni@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-7274
University of Verona · ITCasa di Cura Villa Garda · ITOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STING is a molecule involved in immune reactions against double-stranded DNA fragments, released in infective and neoplastic diseases, whose role in the interactions between immune and neoplastic cells in clear cell renal cell carcinoma has not been studied yet. We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of STING in a series of 146 clear-cell renal cell carcinomas and correlated it with the main pathological prognostic factors. Furthermore, tumoral inflammatory infiltrate was evaluated and studied for the subpopulations of lymphocytes. Expression of STING was observed in 36% (53/146) of the samples, more frequently in high-grade (G3-G4) tumors (48%,43/90) and recurrent/metastatic ones (75%, 24/32) than in low grade (G1-G2) and indolent neoplasms (16%, 9/55). STING staining correlated with parameters of aggressive behavior, including coagulative granular necrosis (p = 0.001), stage (p < 0.001), and development of metastases (p < 0.001). Among prognostic parameters, STING immune expression reached an independent statistical significance (p = 0.029) in multivariable analysis, along with the stage and the presence of coagulative granular necrosis. About tumor immune-environment, no significant statistical association has been demonstrated between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and STING. Our results provide novel insights regarding the role of STING in aggressive clear cell renal cell carcinomas, suggesting its adoption as a prognostic marker and a potentially targetable molecule for specific immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsSarcomaHumansNecrosisPrognosisCancer immune infiltrateClear cell renal cell carcinomasImmunohistochemistryPrognosisSTINGTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID37120444
PMCPMC10326155
OpenAlexW4367367422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.