Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37120134›Full record

ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2023

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Outpatient Tisagenlecleucel Recipients for B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Nausheen Ahmed, William Wesson, Muhammad Umair Mushtaq, David L Porter, Sunita D Nasta, Jamie Brower, Veronika Bachanova, Marie Hu, Loretta J Nastoupil, Olalekan O Oluwole and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Nausheen AhmedUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Electronic address: nahmed5@kumc.edu.
William WessonUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Muhammad Umair MushtaqUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
David L PorterUniversity of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sunita D NastaUniversity of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jamie BrowerUniversity of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Veronika BachanovaDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Marie HuDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Loretta J NastoupilDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Olalekan O OluwoleHematology Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vivek G PatelHematology Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Caspian OliaiDepartment of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Peter A RiedellThe David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael R BishopThe David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Gunjan L ShahDepartment of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Miguel-Angel PeralesDepartment of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Levanto SchachterAdult Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Richard T MaziarzAdult Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Joseph P McGuirkUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Minnesota · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Trial Design and Biostatistical Support CoreP01CA065493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI J SUNIL RAO · 1995 to 2026
$48.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065493NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an approved CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies. Given potentially life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, inpatient tisa-cel infusion and toxicity monitoring are often considered; however, the toxicity profile of tisa-cel may be conducive to outpatient administration. Here we review the characteristics and outcomes of tisa-cel recipients treated in the outpatient setting. Patients age ≥18 years with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received tisa-cel between June 25, 2018, and January 22, 2021, at 9 US academic medical centers were included in a retrospective analysis. Six of the 9 representative centers (75%) had an outpatient program in place. A total of 157 patients were evaluable, including 93 (57%) in the outpatient treatment group and 64 (43%) in the inpatient treatment group. Baseline characteristics, toxicity and efficacy, and resource utilization were summarized. The most common lymphodepletion (LD) regimen was bendamustine in the outpatient group (65%) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (91%) in the inpatient group. The outpatient group had more patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 (51% versus 15%; P < .001), fewer patients with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level above the normal range at the time of LD (32% versus 57%, P = .003) compared to the inpatient group, and a lower Endothelial Activation and Stress Index score (.57 versus 1.4; P < .001). Any-grade CRS and ICANS were lower in the outpatient group (29% versus 56% [P < .001] and 10% versus 16% [P = .051], respectively). Forty-two outpatient tisa-cel recipients (45%) required an unplanned admission, with a median length of stay of 5 days (range, 1 to 27 days), compared to 13 days (range, 4 to 38 days) in the inpatient group. The median number of tocilizumab doses administered was similar in the 2 groups as were the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (5% versus 8%; P = .5) and median length of ICU stay (6 days versus 5 days; P = .7). There were no toxicity-related deaths in the 30 days post-CAR-T infusion in either group. Progression-free survival and overall survival were similar in the 2 groups. With careful patient selection, outpatient tisa-cel administration is feasible and associated with similar efficacy outcomes as inpatient treatment. Outpatient toxicity monitoring and management may help optimize healthcare resource utilization.

Indexed as

CarcinomaLymphoma, Non-HodgkinReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdolescentHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurotoxicity SyndromesOutpatientsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRetrospective Studiescell-associated neurotoxicityReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigentisagenlecleucelB cell malignanciesCD19 CAR-TOutcomesOutpatientTisagenlecleucel

Identifiers

PMID37120134
PMCPMC11027185
OpenAlexW4367185663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.