ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023
HLA amino acid Mismatch-Based risk stratification of kidney allograft failure using a novel Machine learning algorithm.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-organ hierarchy of HLA molecular mismatches in donor-specific antibody development in solid organ transplantations.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWhile associations between HLA antigen-level mismatches (Ag-MM) and kidney allograft failure are well established, HLA amino acid-level mismatches (AA-MM) have been less explored. Ag-MM fails to consider the substantial variability in the number of MMs at polymorphic amino acid (AA) sites within any given Ag-MM category, which may conceal variable impact on allorecognition. In this study we aim to develop a novel Feature Inclusion Bin Evolver for Risk Stratification (FIBERS) and apply it to automatically discover bins of HLA amino acid mismatches that stratify donor-recipient pairs into low versus high graft survival risk groups.
methodsUsing data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we applied FIBERS on a multiethnic population of 166,574 kidney transplants between 2000 and 2017. FIBERS was applied (1) across all HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 locus AA-MMs with comparison to 0-ABDR Ag-MM risk stratification, (2) on AA-MMs within each HLA locus individually, and (3) using cross validation to evaluate FIBERS generalizability. The predictive power of graft failure risk stratification was evaluated while adjusting for donor/recipient characteristics and HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 Ag-MMs as covariates.
resultsFIBERS's best-performing bin (on AA-MMs across all loci) added significant predictive power (hazard ratio = 1.10, Bonferroni adj. p < 0.001) in stratifying graft failure risk (where low-risk is defined as zero AA-MMs and high-risk is one or more AA-MMs) even after adjusting for Ag-MMs and donor/recipient covariates. The best bin also categorized more than twice as many patients to the low-risk category, compared to traditional 0-ABDR Ag mismatching (∼24.4% vs ∼ 9.1%). When HLA loci were binned individually, the bin for DRB1 exhibited the strongest risk stratification; relative to zero AA-MM, one or more MMs in the bin yielded HR = 1.11, p < 0.005 in a fully adjusted Cox model. AA-MMs at HLA-DRB1 peptide contact sites contributed most to incremental risk of graft failure. Additionally, FIBERS points to possible risk associated with HLA-DQB1 AA-MMs at positions that determine specificity of peptide anchor residues and HLA-DQ heterodimer stability.
conclusionFIBERS's performance suggests potential for discovery of HLA immunogenetics-based risk stratification of kidney graft failure that outperforms traditional assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.