Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119593›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2023

Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC).

Elizabeth Bowen, Andrew Irish, Gregory Wilding, Charles LaBarre, Nicole Capozziello, Thomas Nochajski, Robert Granfield, Lee Ann Kaskutas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recovery capital profiles among a heterogeneous sample of individuals in recovery from alcohol problems.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth BowenUniversity at Buffalo School of Social Work, United States. Electronic address: eabowen@buffalo.edu.
Andrew IrishWest Virginia University School of Social Work, United States.
Gregory WildingUniversity at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, Department of Biostatistics, United States.
Charles LaBarreUniversity at Buffalo School of Social Work, United States.
Nicole CapozzielloUniversity at Buffalo School of Social Work, United States.
Thomas NochajskiUniversity at Buffalo School of Social Work, United States.
Robert GranfieldUniversity at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Sociology, United States.
Lee Ann KaskutasAlcohol Research Group, United States.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL ETIOLOGY AND TREATMENTT32AA007583 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI Gregory G Homish, KENNETH E LEONARD · 2000 to 2026
$8.5M
Developing and Testing a Multidimensional Measure of Recovery Capital: Toward Standardized Measurement to Understand andReduce Socioeconomic Disparities in Alcohol Recovery OutcomesR21AA028099 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BOWEN, ELIZABETH A · 2020 to 2021
$408k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA028099NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers have developed several instruments to measure recovery capital-the social, physical, human, and cultural resources that help people resolve alcohol and other drug problems. However, existing measures are hampered by theoretical and psychometric weaknesses. The current study reports on process and psychometric outcomes for the Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC), a novel measure of recovery capital.

methodsWe used a three-phase, mixed methods approach to develop the MIRC. Individuals who identified as having resolved alcohol problems were recruited in each phase. Phase one focused on item development, with participants providing qualitative feedback on potential items. In phase two (pilot testing) and phase three (final psychometric evaluation), participants completed revised versions of the MIRC to assess its psychometric strength and item performance.

resultsPhase one (n=44) resulted in significant item alteration, culminating in a 48-item pilot measure. Pilot testing analyses (n=497) resulted in the deletion or replacement of 17 items. In the final psychometric evaluation (n=482), four additional items were deleted, resulting in a 28-item MIRC comprising four subscales measuring social, physical, human, and cultural capital. The psychometric properties of the final MIRC and its subscales ranged from sound to strong, with high response variability suggesting appropriate item discrimination.

conclusionResults confirm the psychometric strength of the MIRC and underscore the importance of incorporating the insights of diverse samples of people in recovery. The MIRC holds promise as an assessment tool in future research and is available for use at no cost in treatment and community-based settings.

Indexed as

PsychometricsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAlcoholMeasurePsychometricRecoveryRecovery capital

Identifiers

PMID37119593
PMCPMC11520023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.