Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119499›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023

Multicellular Bioprinting of Biomimetic Inks for Tendon-to-Bone Regeneration.

Lin Du, Chen Qin, Hongjian Zhang, Fei Han, Jianmin Xue, Yufeng Wang, Jinfu Wu, Yin Xiao, Zhiguang Huan, Chengtie Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Innervated Multi-Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin DuState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Chen QinState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Hongjian ZhangState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Fei HanState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Jianmin XueState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Yufeng WangNanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68th Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, P. R. China.
Jinfu WuState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Yin XiaoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Zhiguang HuanState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.
Chengtie WuState Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai, 200050, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-591X
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNGriffith University · AUNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research GrantNo.YSRB073National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130062National Natural Science Foundation of China 32225028National Natural Science Foundation of China 52272284Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21520712300Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research-Chinese Academy of Science JCYJ-SHFY-2022-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendon-to-bone interface has a hierarchical structure and gradient component that are conducive to distributing the stresses to achieve movement. Conventional biomaterials lack the capacity to induce synchronous repair of multiple tissues, resulting in the failure of the interface repair. Biomimetic strategies have attracted enormous attention in the field of complex structure regeneration because they can meet the different physiological requirements of multiple tissues. Herein, a biomimetic ink mimicking tendon/bone tissues is developed by combining tendon/bone-related cells and Mo-containing silicate (MS) bioceramics. Subsequently, biomimetic multicellular scaffolds are fabricated to achieve the simulation of the hierarchical structure and cellular composition of tendon-to-bone interfaces by the spatial distribution of the biomimetic inks via 3D bioprinting, which is of great significance for inducing the regeneration of complex structures in the interface region. In addition, attributed to the desirable ionic microenvironment created by MS bioceramics, the biomimetic scaffolds possess the dual function of inducing tendon/bone-related cells tenogenic and osteogenic differentiation in vitro, and promote the integrated regeneration of tendon-to-bone interfaces in vivo. The study offers a feasible strategy to construct biomimetic multicellular scaffolds with bifunction for inducing multi-lineage tissue regeneration, especially for regenerating soft-to-hard tissue interfaces.

Indexed as

BioprintingTissue ScaffoldsBiomimeticsBone RegenerationInkOsteogenesisTendonsTissue Engineering3D bioprintingbiomaterialsbiomimetictendon-to-bone interface regeneration

Identifiers

PMID37119499
PMCPMC10375072
OpenAlexW4367394638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.