Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119460›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2024

Mechanosensory encoding in ex vivo muscle-nerve preparations.

Stephen N Housley, Evelyn A Gardolinski, Paul Nardelli, J'Ana Reed, Mark M Rich, Timothy C Cope

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen N HousleySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-9109
Evelyn A GardolinskiSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4436-7926
Paul NardelliSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J'Ana ReedSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark M RichDepartment of Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Physiology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
Timothy C CopeSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8835-8055
Georgia Institute of Technology · USWright State University · US

Funding

Multiscale models of proprioceptive encoding to reveal mechanisms of impaired sensorimotor controlR01HD090642 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COPE, TIMOTHY C, SAWICKI, GREGORY STEPHEN · 2016 to 2025
$4.9M
Novel Approaches to Therapy of Muscle Ion ChannelopathiesR01AR074985 · NIAMS · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK M RICH · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074985NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090642NIH HHS R01AR074985NIH HHS R01HD090642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate an ex vivo muscle-nerve preparation used to study mechanosensory signalling by low threshold mechanosensory receptors (LTMRs). Specifically, we aimed to assess how well the ex vivo preparation represents in vivo firing behaviours of the three major LTMR subtypes of muscle primary sensory afferents, namely type Ia and II muscle spindle (MS) afferents and type Ib tendon organ afferents. Using published procedures for ex vivo study of LTMRs in mouse hindlimb muscles, we replicated earlier reports on afferent firing in response to conventional stretch paradigms applied to non-contracting, that is passive, muscle. Relative to in vivo studies, stretch-evoked firing for confirmed MS afferents in the ex vivo preparation was markedly reduced in firing rate and deficient in encoding dynamic features of muscle stretch. These deficiencies precluded conventional means of discriminating type Ia and II afferents. Muscle afferents, including confirmed Ib afferents were often indistinguishable based on their similar firing responses to the same physiologically relevant stretch paradigms. These observations raise uncertainty about conclusions drawn from earlier ex vivo studies that either attribute findings to specific afferent types or suggest an absence of treatment effects on dynamic firing. However, we found that replacing the recording solution with bicarbonate buffer resulted in afferent firing rates and profiles more like those seen in vivo. Improving representation of the distinctive sensory encoding properties in ex vivo muscle-nerve preparations will promote accuracy in assigning molecular markers and mechanisms to heterogeneous types of muscle mechanosensory neurons.

Indexed as

Muscle SpindlesTendonsAnimalsMiceNeuronsNeurons, AfferentSignal Transductionelectrophysiologyin vitromechanoreceptormousemuscle spindleproprioceptorsensorytendon organ

Identifiers

PMID37119460
PMCPMC10613129
OpenAlexW4367394469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.