Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119446›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2023

Cervical mobility and cervical proprioception in relation to fall risk among older adults: a prospective cohort study.

Tine Roman de Mettelinge, Patrick Desimpelaere, Dirk Cambier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sensory profiles in older adults with orthopedic conditions during quiet stance: a cross-sectional study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tine Roman de MettelingeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus UZ Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Tine.RomandeMettelinge@Ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5338-0463
Patrick DesimpelaereDepartment of Geriatrics, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk CambierDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus UZ Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEAZ Maria Middelares · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAge-related decreases in cervical mobility and proprioception have previously been demonstrated. Potential associations of these deteriorations with fall risk have not been investigated so far. This study aims to compare cervical mobility and proprioception between fallers and non-fallers and prospectively assess the contribution of these parameters in fall risk identification among healthy older adults.

methods95 community-dwelling older adults underwent a cervical screening. Active cervical range of motion (aCROM) was measured using a digital inclinometer and cervical proprioception was assessed by determining joint position error (JPE). Fear of falling was identified through the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (iconFES). Falls were prospectively recorded during a 1-year follow-up period using monthly calendars. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between these parameters and falls occurrence.

resultsBaseline measurements revealed reduced cervical performance (i.e., smaller aCROM and larger JPE) among individuals who reported at least one fall during the following year ("fallers"). The multivariate logistic regression model contained eight independent variables (age, sex, walking aid, fall history, iconFES, aCROM F, aCROM E and JPE) and correctly classified 77.8% of cases.

conclusionAlthough the contribution of cervical parameters to fall risk identification seems to be rather small compared to well-known (though often unmodifiable) major risk factors, further research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms of cervical functions in relation to falls. Second, it would be interesting to develop a targeted fall preventive cervical exercise program and assess its effectiveness in terms of falls occurrence.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedFearFemaleHumansProprioceptionProspective StudiesCervical mobilityCervical proprioceptionFall riskFear of falling

Identifiers

PMID37119446
PMCPMC10260694
OpenAlexW4367393776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.