Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119368›Full record

ArticleJA clinical reports2023

Safety and utility of ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglion block for headaches and orofacial pain: a retrospective, single-center study of 10 patients.

Aiko Maeda, Yoji Chikama, Ryudo Tanaka, Masachika Tominaga, Kazuhiro Shirozu, Ken Yamaura

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JA clinical reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06134583 (Effect of Superior Cervical Sympathetic Block Versus Stellate Ganglion Block to Treat Cerebral Vasospasm in Patients With Refractory Post-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06134583 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Superior Cervical Sympathetic Block Versus Stellate Ganglion Block to Treat Cerebral Vasospasm in Patients With Refractory Post-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsPost-Traumatic Subarachnoid HemorrhageArmsSuperior cervical sympathetic block group, Stellate ganglion block group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aiko MaedaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maedashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka City, 812-8582, Japan. maeda.aiko.461@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-6865
Yoji ChikamaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maedashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka City, 812-8582, Japan.
Ryudo TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maedashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka City, 812-8582, Japan.
Masachika TominagaOperating Rooms, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazuhiro ShirozuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maedashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka City, 812-8582, Japan.
Ken YamauraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University Hospital · JPKyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral new ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglia blocks (U-SCGBs) have been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional superior cervical ganglia blocks; however, their clinical utility and practicality have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and utility of a new method of U-SCGB.

methodsWe retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent U-SCGB for the treatment of headaches and orofacial pain at a single center. U-SCGB was performed by injecting 2-3 mL of 1% mepivacaine posterior to the internal carotid artery, just above the bifurcation. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pain scores. Numerical data are expressed as the mean ± standard error.

resultsThe total number of U-SCGB procedures was 43. All procedures were accompanied by Horner's sign. The numerical rating scale score for pain (possible scores, 0-10) was reduced predominantly from 7.0 ± 0.7 before treatment to 4.5 ± 0.7 at the follow-up (p = 0.014).

conclusionU-SCGB was considered a clinically useful and accurate treatment for headaches and orofacial pain in this study.

Indexed as

HeadacheOrofacial painStellate ganglion blocksSuperior cervical ganglion blockUltrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID37119368
PMCPMC10148940
OpenAlexW4367368810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.